For an article in the fields of the history of women, gender, and/or sexuality
2020 > Rosanna Dent, ‘Subject 01: exemplary Indigenous masculinity in Cold War genetics’, British Journal of the History of Science, 53 (3), September 2020
Rosanna Dent’s insightful work draws the history of the social sciences to recast our understanding of masculinities and aggression in the culture of the 1960s. She discusses the research on genetics at a time when popular conceptions of evolution were promoting an image of “natural” human masculinity, which some scholars believed could be identiﬁed in indigenous groups still living in tribal communities. A key debate among evolutionary biologists at this time was whether humans have a greater inclination to individual violence or to group cooperation.
She argues that research, focusing on indigenous peoples in Brazil, drove a particular vision of masculine violence: “The arguments which developed out of the research on Apöwẽ and Yanomami warfare promoted an individualistic evolutionary beneﬁt to male aggression, setting up conditions for sociobiologists to frame violence as innate.”
She goes on to show that this research did real-world harms to the Yanomami, as it was instrumentalised by “Brazilian fazendeiros and politicians in an attempt to block the demarcation of a large uniﬁed Yanomami territory.”
Dent explores the persistent tendency in genetics (and popular science) to regard indigenous groups as living exemplars of the deep past, and the use of indigenous people as research subjects to demonstrate evolutionary claims.
2019 > Elisa Camiscioli, “Coercion and Choice: The ‘Traffic in Women’ between France and Argentina in the Early Twentieth Century,” French Historical Studies, Vol. 42, No. 3 (August 2019): 483-507.
2018 > Satyasikha Chakraborty, “European Nurses and Governesses in Indian Princely Households: “Uplifting that impenetrable veil”?” Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History 19/1 (Spring 2018).
2017 > Cassia Roth, “From Free Womb to Criminalized Woman: Fertility Control in Brazilian Slavery and Freedom.” Slavery & Abolition, 38:2
2016 > Amy Stanley, “Maidservants’ Tales: Narrating Domestic and Global History in Eurasia, 1600-1900,” American Historical Review, vol. 121, no. 2, March 2016, pp. 437-460.
The committee overwhelmingly agreed that Stanley’s “Maidservants’ Tales” stood out in a pool of very strong articles in this category because of her innovative integration of micro and global history, two “seemingly incompatible strategies” to illustrate, as she writes, the “small rebellions of ordinary people” which were “common” … “to women across Eurasia over three hundred years.” We found her writing to be highly engaging, and praised her ability to upend our assumptions about women’s lives in vastly different historical contexts. She demonstrates that women’s historians might highlight lives that at first glance appear unimportant because they are, in the case of this article, maidservants, a task performed by young women in broadly different geographical and historical contexts, but still use those lives to draw broad historical understandings.
2015 > Rebecca Jo Plant and Frances M. Clarke, “The Crowning Insult”; Federal Segregation and the Gold Star Mother and Widow Pilgrimages of the Early 1930s”; Journal of American History, 102: 2 (September 2015).
Plant and Clarke highlight the decline in African American status in interwar years, focusing on the “largely forgotten … discriminatory treatment” of mothers and widows of fallen United States soldiers. The federal government-sponsored segregated pilgrimages to Europe from 1930 to 1933 to visit the bodies of their fallen kin became part of an emotionally fraught debate over the limitations of citizenship rights of African Americans, claims of which had pivoted on notions of masculinity. Pressured to boycott the pilgrimages, the “so-called ordinary women” were “forced …to weigh powerful appeals to racial solidarity against deeply felt personal commitments and desires,” which often “signaled their independence from black leaders.” The article prize committee believes that Plant and Clarke compellingly give historical voice to African American women seldom heard from and whose perspectives “harbor[ed] dreams of a radically transformed society.”
2014 > Katherine Paugh, “Yaws, Syphilis, Sexuality, and the Circulation of Medical Knowledge in the British Caribbean and the Atlantic World,” in the Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Volume 88, Number 2, Summer 2014, pp. 225-252.
Carina Ray, “Decrying White Peril: Interracial Sex and the Rise of Anticolonial Nationalism in the Gold Coast,” appearing in the American Historical Review, February 2014.
2013 > Jaime Wadowiec, “Muslim Algerian Women and the Rights of Man: Islam and Gendered Citizenship in French Algeria at the End of Empire,” appearing in French Historical Studies, vol. 36, no. 4 (Fall 2013): 649-676.
For article in any field of history other than the history of women, gender, and/or sexuality
2020 > Amy Chazkel, ‘Toward a History of Rights in the City at Night: Making and Breaking the Nightly Curfew in Nineteenth-Century Rio de Janeiro’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 62 (1), 2020
Amy Chazkel’s work uses temporality as a lens to explore the historical experience of Rio’s residents in the nineteenth century. Night criminalized activities for certain inhabitants–slaves or people who could be taken for slaves, women, foreigners–that were perfectly legal during the daytime. Her creative approach gave a literary ﬂair to the piece, and the committee were particularly impressed with the way her tools could be used by other scholars.
She refers to her sources, police notebooks, as “glimpses through a tiny keyhole at nocturnal public culture before the era of Rio’s famed nightlife, before there was supposed to be any.” Scholars teasing out what existed where it wasn’t “supposed to” is a signiﬁcant way of reading “across the archival grain”, and Chazkel shows how we can extrapolate a broader understanding of the ﬁeld. In her case, this is an urban environment evolving alongside, and through, the development of modern policing, transport and technology.
2019 > Bathsheba Demuth, “The Walrus and the Bureaucrat: Energy, Ecology, and Making the State in the Russian and American Arctic, 1870-1950,” The American Historical Review, Vol. 124, No. 2 (April 2019): 483–510.
2018> Kimberly A. Arkin, “Historicity, Peoplehood, and Politics: Holocaust Talk in Twenty-First-Century France.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 60/4 (October 2018).
Yumi Kim, “Seeing Cages: Home Confinement in Early Twentieth-Century Japan.” The Journal of Asian Studies 77/3 (August 2018).
2017> Carole McGranahan, “Imperial but Not Colonial: Archival Truths, British India, and the Case of the “Naughty” Tibetans.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol 59, No 1.
Vanessa Ogle, “Archipelago Capitalism: Tax Havens, Offshore Money, and the State, 1950s-1970s,” American Historical Review, 122, no. 5.
2016 > Devra Anne Weber, “Wobblies of the Partido Liberal Mexicano: Reenvisioning Internationalist and Transnational Movements through Mexican Lenses,” Pacific Historical Review, 85, no. 2 (May 2016), 188-226.
The committee awarded this prize to Weber for her methodologically interesting approach which decenters the historical narrative of the Wobblies by using a transnational lens to focus on the labor activism of Mexican subjects in territory both north and south of the shifting US/Mexican border. As Weber points out and makes central to her lens, both the people and the border have moved over time. Her transnational focus highlights the diversity of the activists in terms of gender, linguistics, class, and ethnicity as people lived, worked, and organized to target “imperialism as well as industrial capitalism” … “across a transnational space.” She contends that by restricting the history of the IWW to national boundaries, historians have unwittingly marginalized a “complex, messy, multiethnic, and multilingual reality.” We also appreciated her multigenerational scope, which views history “through individuals, families, and communities” to reveal a “multigenerational transmission of values and activism” that reaches up to the present.
2015 > Debora L. Silverman, “Diasporas of Art: History, the Tervuren Royal Museum for Central Africa, and the Politics of Memory in Belgium, 1885–2014,” The Journal of Modern History 87: 3 (September 2015).
The article prize committee agreed that Silverman’s treatment of Belgium’s “colonial amnesia” about the period of King Leopold’s Congo Free State, contributes importantly to international conversations about the historical decontextualization of imperial violence, “demonstrating that patterns of collective forgetting are not unique to Belgium.” Examining the representation of vast collections of artifacts—a “diaspora of objects”—from the Royal Museum for Central Africa in Tervuren, near Brussels, as they recently traveled to the United States, Silverman demonstrates how the perpetuation of the erasure of the “brutal regime’s rampant violence” became a missed opportunity to link United States’ own history of slavery to Africa and the history of imperial violence and exploitation in the Congo. Instead, these exhibitions contributed to a “great forgetting” of the Belgian empire and its violent extractions.
2014 > Julia Phillips Cohen, “Oriental by Design: Ottoman Jews, Imperial Style, and the Performance of Heritage” in American Historical Review, April 2014.
2013 > Molly Loberg, “The Streetscape of Economic Crisis: Commerce, Politics, and Urban Space in Interwar Berlin,” Journal of Modern History, Vol 85, no. 2 (June 2013): 364-402.